Proof Mapping is Injection iff Direct Image Mapping is Injection

[2026-03-18 Wed 07:18] Important note

This page was a personal note, content is not original. I'm getting it out of the archive only a the historical purpose. I should also note that this proof is overengineered and slightly sloppy. #Mathematics


Let \( f: S \to T \) be a mapping.

Let \( f^\to: \mathcal{P}(S) \to \mathcal{P}(T) \) be the direct image mapping of \( f \).

Then:

\( f^\to \) is an injection {{iff}} \( f: S \to T \) is also an injection.

Proof:

Suppose \( f: S \to T \) is a mapping, but not injective.

Then: \[ \exists x_1 \ne x_2 \in S: f(x_1) = f(x_2) = y \]

Let: \[ X_1 = \{ x_1 \} \] \[ X_2 = \{ x_2 \} \] \[ Y = \{ y \} \]

Then it follows that: \[ f^\to(X_1) = f^\to(X_2) = Y \]

Thus \( f^\to: \mathcal{P}(S) \to \mathcal{P}(T) \) is not injective.

So by the Rule of Transposition, the result follows.

lemma

Suppose \( f^\to: \mathcal{P}(S) \to \mathcal{P}(T) \) is not an injection.

Then:

\[ \exists Y \in \mathcal{P}(T): \exists X_1, X_2 \in \mathcal{P}(S): X_1 \ne X_2 \land f^\to(X_1) = f^\to(X_2) = Y \]

There are two cases to consider:

  1. Either \( X_1 \) or \( X_2 \) is the empty set.
  2. Neither \( X_1 \) nor \( X_2 \) is the empty set.

WLOG assume that \( X_1 = \emptyset \).

Then, from Image of Empty Set is Empty Set: \[ Y = f^\to(X_1) = \emptyset \]

But that means: \[ f^\to(X_2) = \emptyset \]

Now \( X_1 \ne X_2 \), so \( X_2 \ne \emptyset \).

Thus: \[ \exists x_2 \in X_2: \neg \exists y \in T: f(x_2) = y \] which means that \( f \) is not even a mapping, let alone an injection.

The same argument applies if \( X_2 \) is empty.

lemma

Now, assume that neither \( X_1 \) nor \( X_2 \) is the empty set.

As \( X_1 \ne X_2 \), there must be at least one element in either one which is not in the other.

WLOG assume that \( \exists x_1 \in X_1: x_1 \notin X_2 \).

Now suppose \( f(x_1) = y \in Y \).

However, as \( f^\to(X_2) = Y \), there must be some \( x_2 \in X_2 \) such that \( f(x_2) = y \in Y \).

So: \[ \exists x_1 \ne x_2 \in S: f(x_1) = f(x_2) \] which means, by definition, that \( f \) is not injective.

Thus, if \( f^\to: \mathcal{P}(S) \to \mathcal{P}(T) \) is not an injection then neither is \( f: S \to T \).

Thus, by the Rule of Transposition, the result follows.

qed